I remember when i was in highschool history books wrote about the first george bush and said it wasn't that good what are history books saying about the new bush now that hes been history for a couple years?

All Answers To Questions

Shoot, dey best be writin dat Obama is a MESSIAH, mmm kay?

Nothing. Books don't write, they are written. Oh, and you may want to check in to taking and paying attention while in an English class. Proper use of capital letters is a good thing. So is punctuation.

We have 3 corporations,which work for massive conglomerates, with some very underhanded agendas that print every single text book you will read in a public institution and community or state universities. So, it would depend on their agenda. My guess, as most seem to be aiming towards a more democratic/left wing society that they would try to paint George Bush as a Conservative, and that he was a bad president. A bad president he was, but he was no Conservative. When I was in high school, it was almost like reading an editorial that is bashing someone. Which is a shame. But Bush deserved it. I just like it when they poses some equality in their discrimination. Alot of it just wasn't valid, or necessary in my opinion.

I hope they are just laying out facts about his term and leaving the reader to make their own opinion, but our educational system is making people dumber so who knows.

That he was a disaster

Historians don't evaluate a president until 18 years after their presidency; it takes that long for their policies to play out. I look forward reading what they have to say about Clinton; we have suffered because of his policies since his presidency, the present economic problems are his policies. And Obama is only increasing their damage by strengthening them as they pull us under as a country.